Issues 8 and 9 passed: how Columbus will elect its City Council
On November 3, 2026, Columbus voters approved Issue 8, a charter amendment placed on the ballot by citizen petition, and Issue 9, a charter amendment referred by City Council, according to unofficial results. Starting with the 2027 elections, each of the nine district council members is elected only by the voters who live in that district, and four new members elected citywide join council in two steps, in 2028 and 2030. A citizen-led commission redraws the district map in 2027, for use from the 2029 elections.
The results
| Measure | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Issue 8 ✓ ApprovedBy citizen petition | 237,17981.8% | 52,91018.2% |
| Issue 9 ✓ ApprovedReferred by Council | 162,27357.2% | 121,26742.8% |
Unofficial results, 562 of 562 precincts reporting, as of November 4, 2026. The county boards of elections certify official results by November 24, 2026.
Citywide totals: the sum of the Franklin, Delaware and Fairfield County boards' election-night unofficial results (the Franklin County Board's unofficial report covers only the Franklin County part of Columbus). The certified citywide totals will replace these after the official canvass. Sources: Franklin County BOE — unofficial results, Franklin County portion (report of Nov. 4, 2026, 12:13 p.m.); Delaware County BOE — unofficial canvass (Nov. 3, 2026, 10:30 p.m.); Fairfield County BOE — unofficial canvass (Nov. 3, 2026, 11:59 p.m.). Issue 8 received 74,906 more yes votes than Issue 9. Results by county are on the Elections page.
What changes, and when
Dates and thresholds are from the certified full text of Issue 9, which has the districting commission appointed by March 1, 2027; the Board of Elections’ ballot language says the redraw occurs in 2027. Much news coverage, including WOSU, ABC6 and the Dispatch before the vote and WOSU on election night, has described the redraw as happening in 2028. The Board’s 2027 election schedule was published before the vote and still lists the earlier 250-signature requirement for district candidates, so confirm filing requirements with the Board.
The ballot language voters approved
This is the wording that appeared on the November 3, 2026 ballot, as published in the Board of Elections’ official notices of election. Each issue was a separate yes-or-no question. It is reproduced verbatim as the record of what voters saw, so it keeps its original “proposed” wording.
This proposed charter amendment would limit the ability to vote for candidates for Columbus City Council to only those electors living within the districts that those candidates seek to represent.
The amendment specifies that ballots within council districts will include both citywide races as well as the district race.
The amendment allows for the initiation of a recall election of a council district representative if a petition is submitted bearing the signatures of the electors of that district in an amount that is at least fifteen (15%) percent of the votes cast within the district in the preceding mayoral election.
Shall the proposed charter amendment be approved?
This proposed charter amendment would limit the ability to vote for candidates for Columbus City Council to only those electors living within the districts that those candidates seek to represent.
The amendment adds two (2) at-large council representatives to be elected in 2027 and seated in 2028, and an additional two (2) at-large council representatives to be elected in 2029 and seated in 2030. All at-large council representatives will be elected for four (4) year terms.
The amendment includes provisions for transitioning from the current nine (9) member Council to an eleven (11) member Council and then subsequently to a thirteen (13) member Council, allowing for the ongoing staggering of terms.
Show the rest of the ballot language (9 more paragraphs)
The amendment allows councilmembers representing districts whose boundaries are redrawn but who still have at least two years remaining in their term to serve the remainder of their term representing a newly-drawn district.
The amendment specifies that candidates for council district seats must have resided within their district for at least one year prior to the primary election.
The amendment calls for a redraw of the current council district map to occur in 2027, and increases the maximum population variance between districts from 1% to 7.5%.
The amendment updates the vote requirements for expelling and/or removing councilmembers for misconduct, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance. The amendment updates the expulsion vote threshold for conduct from “six” to “2/3rds,” and the expulsion vote for absences from “three-fifths” to “2/3rds.”
The amendment updates the charter to reflect the minimum number of councilmembers necessary to achieve a quorum for the purposes of meeting for business.
The amendment increases the number of affirmative votes that would be needed to adopt ordinances or resolutions in concert with expanding the size of the legislature.
The amendment specifies that candidates for district councilmember must collect at least 150 signatures of electors from within their district, and that at-large candidates must collect at least 250 signatures of electors from within the city limits.
The amendment specifies that ballots within council districts will include both citywide races as well as the district race.
The amendment allows for the initiation of a recall election of a council district representative if a petition is submitted bearing the signatures of the electors of that district in an amount equal to or greater than fifteen (15%) percent of the votes cast within the district in the preceding mayoral election. The amendment allows for the initiation of a recall election of an at-large representative if a petition is submitted bearing the signatures of the electors citywide in an amount equal to or greater than fifteen (15%) percent of the votes cast within the district in the preceding mayoral election.
Shall the proposed charter amendment be approved?
The two issues, side by side
Council voted 8–0 on Aug. 24 to send each amendment to voters, with Councilmember Melissa Green absent (Ord. 2354-2026, Ord. 2355-2026); according to the Columbus Dispatch, Green had indicated support for both. Dorans said he worked with the City Attorney’s office so that Council’s amendment would not conflict with the citizen petition.
How we got here
What each side said
Arguments made for the changes
- Supporters of Our City, Our Say said district-only elections give neighborhoods a representative who answers to them directly, and that running in one district costs less than a citywide campaign. “Every resident will have their own city council member elected by the residents in each district directly accountable to them and to the communities within each district,” organizer Will Petrik said (WOSU).
- Jesse Vogel, who led in ABC6’s precinct-level analysis of District 7 in 2025 but lost citywide, said of that result: “It doesn’t make sense to voters. It sows distrust and makes accountability hard” (ABC6).
- Dorans said Issue 9’s four at-large seats keep a citywide voice on issues that cross district lines, such as transit, housing, and workforce development (WOSU). “These two issues work in tandem together to complement one another,” he told county Democrats (WOSU).
- “As our city grows, we need to give more folks a seat at the table and make sure that every neighborhood has a champion,” Council President Shannon Hardin said (ABC6).
Concerns and open questions
- Some labor and Black community leaders raised concerns about how the changes could affect representation on council (WOSU, Aug. 18). Issue 9 does not require majority-minority districts, which some Black leaders had called for (WOSU, Aug. 21).
- Some Our City, Our Say supporters, including former mayoral candidate Joe Motil, backed Issue 8 but criticized Issue 9 (WOSU). A coalition spokesperson said four at-large seats weren’t preferable to many members, though the group wasn’t opposing Issue 9 (WOSU, Aug. 21).
- Council chief of staff John Tannous, arguing for citywide seats, said research shows that “when cities move to a district-based council, they tend to see housing production drop dramatically.” District 7 Councilmember Tiara Ross said a citywide perspective is needed on housing (ABC6).
- With four new seats, a 2027 map redraw, and new council rules, Issue 9 is a larger structural change than Issue 8.
Reactions to the result
- Council President Pro Tem Rob Dorans, who introduced Issue 9, said he was glad both passed, “by overwhelming majorities.” He attributed Issue 9’s lower support to its being more complicated; as WOSU noted, its full text ran six pages to Issue 8’s one (WOSU, Nov. 3).
- Will Petrik of Our City, Our Say thanked the voters and organizations that backed the coalition and said it looks forward to “robust conversations about our city’s future in each district” and a more level playing field for new candidates (Columbus Underground, Nov. 4).
- Some coalition members had urged a no vote on Issue 9. One, DSA Columbus member Zach Sparks, attributed the gap between the two results to a campaign against Issue 9 that ran streaming ads and sent mailers (WOSU, Nov. 3).
In August, an Our City, Our Say spokesperson said Council’s measure didn’t undermine the petition amendment (WOSU, Aug. 21). In September, organizers Will Petrik and Adrienne Hood urged county Democrats to back both issues (WOSU, Sept. 23). The coalition campaigned for Issue 8; according to the Dispatch, its 20 member organizations could not reach consensus on Issue 9, and the coalition took no position on it. Endorsements before the vote: Franklin County Democratic Party — Issue 8 and Issue 9 (Sept. 22, 2026); Columbus Dispatch editorial board — Issue 9, calling a yes vote on Issue 8 “a step in the right direction” (Oct. 5, 2026). The points above summarize positions publicly stated by the named parties; they are not endorsements. Columbus Districts is a nonpartisan reference and did not take a position on either issue.
Common questions
What are Columbus Issues 8 and 9?
Two amendments to the Columbus City Charter that voters approved on November 3, 2026, according to unofficial results. Issue 8, placed on the ballot by citizen petition, has each district council member elected only by the voters in that district. Issue 9, referred by City Council, makes the same change and adds four members elected citywide, growing council to 13 members by 2030.
Did Issues 8 and 9 pass?
Yes. Issue 8 passed with 81.8% of the vote and Issue 9 with 57.2%, according to unofficial results. The county boards of elections certify official results by November 24, 2026. Both amendments take effect: when it placed Issue 9 on the ballot, City Council found that the two do not conflict.
When do district-only City Council elections start?
With the November 2, 2027 general election. Districts 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9 are on that ballot, and each race is decided only by the voters who live in that district. Districts 1, 3, 4 and 7 follow in 2029.
How many members will Columbus City Council have?
Nine until January 2028, when two at-large members elected in 2027 take office, making 11. Two more, elected in 2029, take office in January 2030, making 13: nine elected by district and four elected citywide.
When will the council district map be redrawn?
In 2027. A citizen-led districting commission is to be appointed by March 1, 2027, and City Council must adopt one of its plans by the end of 2027. The new map is first used in the 2029 elections; the 2027 elections use the current map.
What to watch next
From 2027, you vote only in your own district’s council race, plus the at-large races.
Look up your address →District candidates: 150 signatures from the district and one year of residency before the primary. At-large: 250 signatures citywide. Petitions are due by 4 p.m. on February 3, 2027.
How to run in 2027 →Board of Elections 2027 schedule →The districting commission is to be appointed by March 1, 2027. The commission holds public meetings before submitting plans, and Council adopts the new map by ordinance.
Council meeting calendar → Council email updates →The 2027 council elections, with dates and results history, are on the Elections page.
- Franklin County BOE — unofficial results, Franklin County portion (report of Nov. 4, 2026, 12:13 p.m.)
- Delaware County BOE — unofficial canvass (Nov. 3, 2026, 10:30 p.m.)
- Fairfield County BOE — unofficial canvass (Nov. 3, 2026, 11:59 p.m.)
- Directive 2026-48: canvass and certification of the Nov. 3, 2026 general election (PDF, Ohio Secretary of State, Oct. 2, 2026)
- Columbus voters pass Issues 8 and 9, adding four new council members, among other changes — WOSU, Nov. 3, 2026
- Both Columbus Issue 8 and Issue 9 pass, according to unofficial election results — NBC4, Nov. 4, 2026
- Voters approve Columbus City Council election changes — Axios Columbus, Nov. 4, 2026
- 2026 Ohio Election Results — Columbus Underground, Nov. 4, 2026
- Changes coming to how council is elected after Issues 8, 9 pass in Columbus — ABC6, Nov. 4, 2026
- Certified Questions and Issues, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election (PDF)
- Notice of Election: Issue 8, Columbus charter amendment by petition (PDF, Sept. 14, 2026)
- Notice of Election: Issue 9, Columbus charter amendment by Council (PDF, Sept. 14, 2026)
- Full text of Issue 8 (PDF)
- Full text of Issue 9 (PDF)
- 2026 election information
- 2027 election information (primary and general election schedules, published Sept. 2026)
- Official results, Nov. 4, 2025 General Election: Most Populous summary (PDF; despite a “Franklin County Only” footer, its Columbus totals include the Delaware and Fairfield County parts of the city)
- Ordinance 2354-2026: submits the citizen petition amendment (passed Aug. 24, 2026)
- Ordinance 2355-2026: submits Council’s amendment; Section 5 finds no conflicting provisions (passed Aug. 24, 2026)
- Ordinance 2451-2026: corrects a drafting error in Ord. 2354-2026 (passed Aug. 31, 2026)
- Ohio Questions and Issues Handbook, ch. 10: charters (PDF, Ohio Secretary of State; copy hosted by the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections)
- 2026 election calendar (PDF, Ohio Secretary of State)
- Sneaky Columbus council trying to maintain power with fake voting reform — Columbus Dispatch guest column, Oct. 14, 2026
- Columbus voters must ditch rigged council system. The status quo must go — Columbus Dispatch editorial board, Oct. 5, 2026
- Franklin County Democrats endorse both ballot issues to reform Columbus City Council — WOSU, Sept. 23, 2026
- Issue 8 vs. Issue 9: what Columbus voters need to know before Election Day — ABC6, Sept. 24, 2026
- Columbus City Council passes proposals to expand body, overhaul elections to Nov. ballot — ABC6, Aug. 24, 2026
- Two Columbus City Council reform amendments headed to November ballot — Columbus Dispatch, Aug. 24, 2026
- Columbus City Council sends two council reform amendments to November ballot — WOSU, Aug. 24, 2026
- Columbus City Council proposes a hybrid model of at-large and district voting — WOSU, Aug. 21, 2026
- Labor and Black leaders raise concerns on Columbus City Council reform effort — WOSU, Aug. 18, 2026
- Group collects enough valid signatures for vote on how Columbus elects city council — WOSU, July 30, 2026
- Our City Our Say submits 23,000 signatures to force a vote on how Columbus elects city council — WOSU, July 16, 2026
- Columbus City Council will see some reforms, but not for another six years — WOSU, May 11, 2018
Columbus Districts is nonpartisan. It is not affiliated with the City of Columbus, Columbus City Council, or any political campaign, including any campaign that supported or opposed Issue 8 or Issue 9. About this site.
Last updated: November 4, 2026